United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Florence Division
L. WOOTEN SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
matter is before the Court on Defendant's motion for a
sentence reduction pursuant to the First Step Act of 2018.
For the reasons set forth in detail in the Court's prior
order and the Fourth Circuit's recent decision in
United States v. Wirsing, 943 F.3d 175 (4th Cir.
2019), the Court concludes that he is eligible for a reduced
sentence under the First Step Act. ECF No. 157. The Court has
carefully considered the additional filings he submitted in
response to the Court's order. See ECF No. 162.
Defendant is eligible for a sentence reduction, a reduction
is not automatic. Section 404(c) of the First Step Act
explicitly provides that “[n]othing in this section
shall be construed to require a court to reduce any sentence
pursuant to this section.” Notably, Wirsing
did not address whether that particular defendant's
sentence should have been reduced, only that he was eligible
for consideration. See Wirsing, 943 F.3d at 186.
considering whether to reduce Defendant's sentence, the
Court has carefully reviewed the Presentence Investigation
Report and Sentence Reduction Report, and has considered the
current statutory range, the Guidelines range, the §
3553(a) factors, and evidence of post-sentencing mitigation.
Defendant requests a reduction to time served. ECF No. 149 at
2. The Government consents to a reduction to time served,
albeit without any discussion of why that would be an
appropriate reduction. See Id. The Government also
acknowledges that, after factoring in his two-level §
5K1.1 departure, his pre- and post-First Step Act Guidelines
ranges are the same- 210 to 262 months. See ECF No.
146 at 1. The Court notes that he was held accountable for 95
grams of crack, which is below the 280-gram threshold made
applicable by the First Step Act and the Fair Sentencing Act.
While he was a career offender when originally sentenced, due
to post-sentencing changes in the law, he would not be a
career offender if he were being sentenced
today. In light of these considerations, the
Court will reduce his sentence to 216 months or time served,
whichever is greater. Notably, a 216-month sentence is within
the pre- and post- First Step Act Guidelines range of 210 to
the First Step Act's change of Defendant's statutory
term of supervised release to at least 8 years results in a
corresponding change to his Guidelines range of supervised
release, and the Court concludes that it would be appropriate
to reduce his term of supervised release to 8 years.
these reasons, Defendant's motion, ECF No. 149, is
GRANTED. An amended judgment will follow.
IS SO ORDERED.
 The First Step Act does not authorize
a challenge to his career offender designation, as he is not
entitled to a full resentencing. Additionally, Supreme Court
and Fourth Circuit precedent bar a habeas challenge to a
career offender designation. See Beckles v. United
States, 137 S.Ct. 886, 895 (2017); United States v.
Brown, 868 F.3d 297, 304 (4th Cir. 2017), cert.
denied, 139 S.Ct. 14 (2018); United States v.
Foote, 784 F.3d 931, 936 (4th Cir. 2015). But although
he cannot now challenge his career offender designation, the
fact that he would not be a career offender today is an
appropriate factor to weigh in considering whether a sentence
reduction under the First Step Act is appropriate.
 Pursuant to United States v.
Ketter, 908 F.3d 61 (4th Cir. 2018), to the extent that
a sentence of time served constitutes an upward variance,
having carefully considered the record in this case and the
§ 3553(a) factors, the Court concludes that such a
variance is warranted. See, e.g., United States
v. Laguerre, No. 5:02-cr-30098-3, 2019 WL 861417, at
*3-4 (W.D. Va. Feb. 22, 2019) (“In particular, the need
to protect the public and the need for deterrence dictates
that a defendant not be allowed to ‘bank time,'
which could allow him to commit further crimes without the
fear of imprisonment. . . . The court also considers the need
to avoid unwarranted sentencing disparities and the fact that