Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

T&S Brass and Bronze Works, Inc. v. Slanina

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Greenville Division

February 15, 2017

T&S Brass and Bronze Works, Inc. and EnviroPure Systems, LLC, Plaintiffs,
v.
James Slanina, Linda Basinger, Advantago, Inc. d/b/a Advantagreen, and Opus Distribution, Inc. Defendants.

          ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ENTRY OF PROTOCOL FOR SEARCHES OF ELECTRONIC DEVICES

          Mary Geiger Lewis United States District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following protocol will govern the examination of devices containing electronic files agreed to or ordered to be produced in this action (“Device(s)”) on or after the date of this Order, as well as the handling of information derived from the same:

         1. The party seeking discovery that necessitates a forensic search or analysis of computer devices (“Requesting Party”) will designate a computer forensic contractor (“Consultant”). All searches and reports produced will be conducted and produced by a licensed private investigator pursuant to S.C. Code § 40-18-20 et seq.

         2. Counsel for the party producing the Devices (“Producing Party”) will meet with the Consultant at the office of counsel for the Producing Party or other mutually agreed upon location and will deliver responsive Devices to the Consultant. The Producing Party also will provide the Consultant with any passwords/passcodes or other keys necessary to access all data on each Device produced. The Consultant will not disclose the password/passcode or keys to the Requesting Party.

         3. The Consultant will create mirror images of the Devices and may conduct forensic examinations of such images of the Devices in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Order. (See ¶ 15).

         4. Any Consultant and/or representative of an Approved Consultant who is involved in this litigation in any way, including but not limited to the imaging, examination, compilation, use or disclosure of data from any Devices, is bound by the terms of this Order, and counsel for Requesting Party shall provide a copy of this Order to each Consultant so involved.

         5. The Consultant may create forensic mirror images of any of the Devices (hereinafter the “Forensic Image”) in a format that can be searched by Consultant. Whenever a Forensic Image is created, the Consultant shall simultaneously create an exact duplicate “read only” mirror image (hereinafter the “Read Only Image”) in a format that preserves and secures the original images from the Devices. The Read Only Image shall only be used for creating additional Forensic Images, if necessary. (The Forensic Images and Read Only Images are collectively referred to hereafter as the “Images”.)

         6. The creation of the Images will occur either at the office of counsel for the Producing Party or at another mutually-agreeable location.

         7. After Images are created and processed, Consultant shall return the Devices to the office of the Producing Party's Counsel.

         8. Requesting Party will submit to counsel for Producing Party a list of search terms to be used in searching the Forensic Images. Counsel for Producing Party shall have seven (7) calendar days from receipt of this list to raise any objections to the term search list. The Consultant may proceed with searches using the terms to which the Producing Party has not objected.

         9. At Requesting Party's request and expense, the Consultant may conduct a search of the Forensic Images to locate documents and/or files containing the approved search terms. The results of this search will be the ‘‘Search Results.'' The search of the Forensic Images may occur either at a lab or office at which such work is regularly performed by Consultant in South Carolina.

         10. Depending on the volume of the Search Results, Producing Party's Counsel may review the Search Results in a hard copy list format, or electronically in a review platform.

         11. Counsel for Producing Party will review the Search Results and within 14 calendar days of receiving the Search Results shall identify for Requesting Party's Counsel any files/documents for which (s)he raises an objection as to the production of such information to Requesting Party. In the event Producing Party's Counsel needs additional time to conduct this review, he may request a reasonable extension of this time period to complete his review, which shall not be unreasonably denied. Any files to which Producing Party does not assert an objection within the review period will then be provided to Requesting Party's Counsel by the Consultant.

         12. Requesting Party must respond to any objection within 7 calendar days, but shall not be provided copies of the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.