Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Jackson v. Richland County Board of Elections

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division

August 18, 2016

Howard Jackson, Plaintiff,
v.
Richland County Board of Elections and Voter Registration, and Samuel J. Selph, Defendants.

          Robert F. Goings, DCID No. 9838 Goings Law Firm, LLC and Karl S. Bowers, Jr., DCID No. 7716 Bowers Law Office, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff

          Regina Hollins Lewis, DCID No. 7553 Lee Ellen Bagley, DCID No. 11453 GAFFNEY LEWIS & EDWARDS, LLC Attorneys for Defendant Richland County Board of Elections and Voter Registration

          William M. Spillane, DCID No. 4886 Attorney for Defendant Selph

          CONSENT CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER

          PAIGE J. GOSSETT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

         Whereas, the parties to this Consent Confidentiality Order ("parties"), have stipulated that certain discovery material is and should be treated as confidential, and have agreed to the terms of this order; accordingly, it is this 16th day of August, 2016, ORDERED:

         1. Scope. All documents produced in the course of discovery, all responses to discovery requests and all deposition testimony and deposition exhibits and any other materials which may be subject to discovery (hereinafter collectively "documents") shall be subject to this Order concerning confidential information as set forth below.

         2. Form and Timing of Designation. Confidential documents shall be so designated by placing or affixing the word "CONFIDENTIAL" on the document in a manner which will not interfere with the legibility of the document and which will permit complete removal of the confidential designation. Documents shall be designated CONFIDENTIAL prior to, or contemporaneously with, the production or disclosure of the documents except for documents produced for inspection under the "Reading Room" provisions set forth in paragraph 4 below. Inadvertent or unintentional production of documents without prior designation as confidential shall not be deemed a waiver, in whole or in part, of the right to designate documents as confidential as otherwise allowed by this Order.

         3. Documents Which May be Designated Confidential. Any party may designate documents as confidential but only after review of the documents by an attorney[1] who has, in good faith, determined that the documents contain information protected from disclosure by statute, sensitive personal information, trade secrets, or confidential research, development, or commercial information. The certification shall be made concurrently with the disclosure of the documents, using the form attached hereto at Attachment A which shall be executed subject to the standards of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Information or documents which are available in the public sector may not be designated as confidential.

         4. Reading Room. In order to facilitate timely disclosure of large numbers of documents which may contain confidential documents, but which have not yet been reviewed and marked, the following "Reading Room" provisions may be utilized.

a. Documents may be produced for review at a party's facility or other controlled location ("Reading Room"), prior to designation as confidential. After review of these documents, the party seeking discovery may specify those for which further production is requested. The producing party shall then copy the requested documents for production. To the extent any of the requested documents warrant a CONFIDENTIAL designation, the copies shall be so marked prior to further production.
b. Unless otherwise agreed or ordered, copies of Reading Room documents shall be requested within twenty days of review in the Reading Room and shall be produced within thirty days after the request is made.
c. The producing party shall maintain a log of persons who have reviewed documents in the Reading Room and the dates and time of their presence.
d. The production of documents for review within the confines of a Reading Room shall not be deemed a waiver of any claim of confidentiality, so long as the reviewing parties are advised that the Reading Room production is pursuant to this provision and that the Reading Room may contain confidential materials which have not yet been marked as confidential.

e. Until such time as further production is made of documents reviewed in a Reading Room, the reviewing party shall treat all material reviewed as if it was marked CONFIDENTIAL at the time reviewed.

Depositions.

6. Protection of Confidential ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.