United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Charleston Division
June 30, 2015
EDWARD TERRICK DRUMMOND, Plaintiff,
SPARTANBURG COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, CAPT. FREEMAN, DET. CALLOWAY, T. HADDEN, CORP. J. THOMAS, SGT. CENTER, SGT. NICHOLS, CAPT. McCANN, DET. NODINE, and SGT. CURBY, Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND WITHOUT ISSUANCE AND SERVICE OF PROCESS.
MARY G. LEWIS, District Judge.
This case was filed as a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge suggesting that the Court dismiss the Complaint without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. The Report was made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina.
The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report to which specific objection is made, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
The Magistrate Judge filed the Report on June 5, 2015, and the Clerk of Court entered Plaintiff's objections on June 19, 2015. The Court has reviewed the objections, but finds them to be without merit. Therefore, it will enter judgment accordingly.
In Plaintiff's objections, he makes no specific objections to the Report. Instead, he generally reiterates claims that the Magistrate Judge has already considered and rejected. Because the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge's treatment of those issues, it need not discuss them again here. Therefore, it will overrule Plaintiff's objections.
After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case pursuant to the standard set forth above, the Court adopts the Report to the extent that it does not contradict this Order, and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of this Court that the Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and without issuance and service of process.
Further, as per Plaintiff's request, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send to Plaintiff a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 packet.
IT IS SO ORDERED.