United States District Court, D. South Carolina
PAIGE J. GOSSETT, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
The plaintiff has filed this action, pro se, seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, an inmate with the South Carolina Department of Corrections, alleges violations of his constitutional rights by the named defendants. The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on May 21, 2015, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 38.) As the plaintiff is proceeding pro se, the court entered an order pursuant to Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975) on May 22, 2015, advising the plaintiff of the importance of a motion for summary judgment and of the need for her to file an adequate response. (ECF No. 38.) The plaintiff was specifically advised that if she failed to respond adequately, the defendants’ motion may be granted, thereby ending her case.
Notwithstanding the specific warning and instructions set forth in the court’s Roseboro order, the plaintiff has failed to respond to the motion. As such, it appears to the court that she does not oppose the motion and wishes to abandon this action.
Based on the foregoing, it is
ORDERED that the plaintiff shall advise the court as to whether she wishes to continue with this case and to file a response to the defendants’ motion for summary judgment within fourteen (14) days from the date of this order. Plaintiff is further advised that if she fails to respond, this action will be recommended for dismissal with prejudice for ...