Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. March

United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division

March 9, 2015

United States of America,
v.
Gonzales March, Defendant.

OPINION and ORDER

CAMERON McGOWAN CURRIE, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the court pursuant to Defendant's pro se motion for reconsideration. ECF No. 1594. The Government has not responded to Defendant's motion.

Defendant seeks reconsideration of the court's denial of relief under Amendment 782. See Order, ECF Nos. 1590. Defendant again argues that he entitled to relief under Amendment 782. See generally Motion.

Pursuant to United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 236 (4th Cir. 2010), "the clear intent of § 3582 is to constrain postjudgment sentence modifications...." Section § 3582(c) "gives a district court one-and only one-opportunity to apply the retroactive amendments and modify the sentence." United States v. Mann, 435 F.Appx. 254, 254 (2011) (citing Goodwyn, 596 F.3d at 236); see also United States v. Redd, 630 F.3d 649, 651 (7th Cir. 2011). Accordingly, this court is without jurisdiction to entertain Defendant's motion for relief under § 3582(c).

Therefore, Defendant's motion for reconsideration is dismissed as this court is without jurisdiction to entertain it.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.