United States District Court, D. South Carolina
October 15, 2014
Gary B. Nelson, Plaintiff,
Lewis King Cutter; The State, Defendants.
PAIGE J. GOSSETT, Magistrate Judge.
This is a civil action filed by a federal prisoner. Therefore, in the event that a limitations issue arises, Plaintiff shall have the benefit of the holding in Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 (1988) (prisoner's pleading was filed at the moment of delivery to prison authorities for forwarding to District Court). Under Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) DSC, pretrial proceedings in this action have been referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge.
On September 5, 2014, the court issued an order directing Plaintiff to provide documents necessary for initial review. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff substantially complied with the order and this case is now in proper form.
PAYMENT OF THE FILING FEE:
By filing this case, Plaintiff has incurred a debt to the United States of America in the amount of $350. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914. This debt is not dischargeable in the event Plaintiff seeks relief under the bankruptcy provisions of the United States Code. See 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(17). The Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996), permits a prisoner to file a civil action without prepayment of fees or security, but requires the prisoner "to pay the full amount of the filing fee" as funds are available. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), (b). As the court grants Plaintiff permission to proceed in forma pauperis below, the agency having custody of Plaintiff shall collect payments from Plaintiff's prisoner trust account in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2), until the full $350 filing fee is paid. See Torres v. O'Quinn , 612 F.3d 237, 252 (4th Cir. 2010) ("We hold that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2) caps the amount of funds that may be withdrawn from an inmate's trust account at a maximum of twenty percent regardless of the number of cases or appeals the inmate has filed. ") (emphasis in original).
Plaintiff has submitted an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Form AO 240) and a Financial Certificate, which are construed as a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), (2). A review of the Motion indicates that Plaintiff has $4.89 available to pay an initial installment of the filing fee. (ECF No. 7-1.) However, the docket does not reflect the receipt of an initial installment to date. Therefore, the amount due from Plaintiff is currently $350.
Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted. (ECF No. 7.)
TO THE CLERK OF COURT:
This case is subject to summary dismissal based on an initial screening conducted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915 and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Therefore, the Clerk of Court shall not issue the summonses or forward this matter to the United States Marshal for service of process at this time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.