United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division
OneWest Bank FSB, successor in interest to C/A IndyMac Federal Bank FSB (IndyMac) 2013, Plaintiff,
James B. Bailey, also known as James Bradley Bailey, Defendant.
JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge.
Defendant James Bradley Bailey purports to remove a state foreclosure action (Civil Action No. 09-CP-32-723) associated with property located at 108 Westpointe Court, Lexington, South Carolina based on federal question jurisdiction. (ECF No. 1). The Magistrate Judge assigned to this action sua sponte prepared a thorough Report and Recommendation ("Report") recommending that this action be remanded to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Report sets forth in detail the relevant facts and standards of law on this matter, and this Court incorporates those facts and standards without a recitation.
The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report, which was entered on the docket on August 7, 2014. (ECF No. 17). However, no objections were filed. In the absence of specific objections to the Report of the Magistrate Judge, this Court is not required to give an explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983).
After carefully reviewing the applicable laws, the record in this case, as well as the Report, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge's recommendation fairly and accurately summarizes the facts and applies the correct principles of law. Accordingly, the ...