United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Greenville Division
TIMOTHY M. CAIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Jackie Logan, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 73.02, D.S.C., this matter was referred to a magistrate judge for pretrial handling. Before the court is the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation ("Report"), recommending that Plaintiff's case be summarily dismissed without prejudice and without service of process. (ECF No. 17). Plaintiff was advised of his right to file objections to the Report. (ECF No. 17 at 4). Plaintiff timely filed objections. (ECF No. 21).
The Report has no presumptive weight and the responsibility to make a final determination in this matter remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The court need not conduct a de novo review when a party makes only "general and conclusory objections that do not direct the court to a specific error in the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations." Orpiano v. Johnson, 687 F.2d 44, 47 (4th Cir. 1982). In that case, the court reviews the Report only for clear error. See Diamond v. Colonial Life & Accident Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005).
As set forth above, Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Report. (ECF No. 21). However, his objections fail to address any specific, dispositive portion of the Report. The objections are non-specific, unrelated to the dispositive portions of the Report or merely restate Plaintiff's claims. The court has thoroughly reviewed the Report and Plaintiff's objections and finds no reason to deviate from the Report's recommended disposition.
Accordingly, the court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report (ECF No. 17) and incorporates it herein. It is therefore ORDERED that Plaintiff's case is summarily DISMISSED ...