Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Fleming v. Medical Nurse, Scdc

United States District Court, D. South Carolina

September 8, 2014

James A. Fleming, Plaintiff,
v.
Medical Nurse, SCDC; William Brown, Officer SCDC; E. Tyler, Officer SCDC; Bernard McKie, Warden SCDC; and Robert Ward, Acting Director, in their individual and official capacities, Defendants.

ORDER

DAVID C. NORTON, District Judge.

The above referenced case is before this court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that defendant Medical Nurse's motion to dismiss be denied without prejudice.

This court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, absent prompt objection by a dissatisfied party, it appears that Congress did not intend for the district court to review the factual and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Additionally, any party who fails to file timely, written objections to the magistrate judge's report pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives the right to raise those objections at the appellate court level. United States v. Schronce , 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1208 (1984).[1] No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation.

A de novo review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. Accordingly, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is AFFIRMED, and defendant Medical Nurse's motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff be given an additional thirty (30) days to identify, in writing, the individual Nurse against whom he is asserting claims in this lawsuit. If he does so, the court will then issue such additional orders as are necessary for the prosecution of this case. If he does not do so, then defendant Medical Nurse as set forth in the caption will be dismissed as a party defendant in this case.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.