United States District Court, D. South Carolina, Florence Division
September 2, 2014
Jerleen Dozier Mack, Plaintiff,
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration,  Defendant.
TIMOTHY M. CAIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees pursuant to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (ECF No. 40). Plaintiff seeks an award of attorney's fees in the amount of $16, 102.25. Id. The Commissioner has filed a response informing the court that she does not object to Plaintiff's motion for fees. (ECF No. 42)
Pursuant to Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 808 (2002), in reviewing a request for attorney's fees under § 406(b), a court must look first to the contingent fee agreement and assess its reasonableness. A reduction in the contingent fee may be appropriate when (1) the fee is out of line with the character of the representation and the results achieved; (2) counsel's delay caused past-due benefits to accumulate during the pendency of the case in court, or (3) past-due benefits are large in comparison to the amount of time counsel spent on the case. Id.
Based upon a review of the petition and these factors, the court finds that an award of $16, 102.25 is reasonable. Pursuant to a contingency fee agreement, Plaintiff agreed to pay counsel twenty-five percent (25%) of any past-due benefits. Plaintiff was awarded $88, 409.00 in back benefits and, in compliance with 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)(1)(A), counsel's requested fee does not exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of these past-due benefits. Furthermore, the requested attorney's fee is reasonable given that counsel expended 32.70 hours working on this matter at the court level. Wrenn v. Astrue, 525 F.3d 931, 937 (10th Cir. 2008) (noting that under § 406(b) the court makes fee awards only for work done before the court). Additionally, Plaintiff's counsel achieved a successful result without any unreasonable delay. In light of counsel's specialized skill in social security disability cases, the attorney's fee award does not amount to a windfall. Cf. Brown v. Barnhart, 270 F.Supp.2d 769, 772-73 (W.D.Va. 2003).
Therefore, based on the foregoing, Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees (ECF No. 40) is granted and Plaintiff is awarded $16, 102.25 in attorney's fees, as requested.
IT IS SO ORDERED.