Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Culp v. Alewine

United States District Court, D. South Carolina

July 14, 2014

Fredrick Y. Culp, Plaintiff,
v.
Dr. Alewine; Dr. Amonitti; Nurse Davis; Paul Drago; Yvonne McDonald; Michelle Ussemy; Dr. John Pate, Defendants.

ORDER

JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge.

The pro se plaintiff, Fredrick Culp, is an inmate with the South Carolina Department of Corrections. He brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that the defendants violated his constitutional rights relating to his medical care in 2004 and 2005. Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and damages.

The Magistrate Judge assigned to this action[1] has prepared a Report and Recommendation and opines that the plaintiff has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and that the defendants' motion for summary judgment[2] should be granted. The Report sets forth in detail the relevant facts and standards of law on this matter, and the court incorporates such without a recitation.

The plaintiff was notified of his right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. The court has reviewed the objections and finds them repetitive of the same conclusory allegations in plaintiff's complaint and without specific reference to the issues raised by the Magistrate Judge. As such, the objections are overruled.

The Magistrate Judge properly notes in his Report that prisoners must exhaust their administrative remedies prior to filing a § 1983 suit in federal court. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), Booth v. Churner, 532 U.S. 731, 741 (2001); and Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516 (2002). The Magistrate Judge also opines that the defendant has met his burden of showing that the plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See Anderson v. XYZ Correctional Health Svcs., Inc., 407 F.3d 674 (4th Cir. 2005); Jones v. Bock, 549 U.S. 199 (2007).

After carefully reviewing the applicable laws, the record in this case, the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, this court finds the Magistrate Judge's recommendation fairly and accurately summarizes the facts and applies the correct principles of law. The Report is adopted and incorporated herein by reference.

Accordingly, the defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 68) on the issue of exhaustion is granted and plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Defendant Pate's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 54) is granted as well.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.