Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Wright v. Mora

United States District Court, D. South Carolina

June 24, 2014

Jimmy F. Wright, Petitioner,
v.
Steven Mora, Warden of FCI Estill, Respondent.

ORDER

JOSEPH F. ANDERSON, Jr., District Judge.

The pro se petitioner, Jimmy F. Wright, brings this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 challenging the decision of the United States Parole Commission denying his parole.

The Magistrate Judge assigned to this action[1] has prepared a Report and Recommendation wherein she opines that the respondent's motion to dismiss or for summary judgment[2] should be granted. The Report sets forth in detail the relevant facts and standards of law on this matter, and the court incorporates such without a recitation.

The petitioner was advised of his right to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. However, the petitioner did not file objections and the time within which to do so has now expired. In the absence of specific objections to the Report of the Magistrate Judge, this court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983).

After a careful review of the record, the applicable law, and the Report and Recommendation, the court finds the Magistrate Judge's recommendation proper and adopts and incorporates the Report herein by reference. Accordingly, the respondent's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 14) is granted and the petition is dismissed with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.