Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Lydia

June 5, 2008

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
v.
PAM LYDIA, A/K/A PAMELA JOAN LYDIA, DEFENDANT.



ORDER

(Written Opinion)

This matter comes before the Court on the defendant's pro se motion to modify her sentence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2), U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 and U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(c), filed on April 3, 2008. Defendant argues that she is entitled to a modification of her sentence based on a new amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines which became effective November 1, 2007. Specifically, she claims that her criminal history category should be lowered because the "new amendment changes the probation criterion at [U.S.S.G. §] 4A1.2(c)(1) from a term of 'at least' one year to a term of 'more than' one year, when calculating criminal history points." (Defendant's Motion to Reduce 1.) For the following reasons, the Court denies Defendant's motion.

Standard of Review

Defendant brings this claim pro se. This Court is required to construe pro se pleadings liberally. Such pleadings are held to a less stringent standard than those drafted by attorneys. See Gordon v. Leeke, 574 F.2d 1147, 1151 (4th Cir. 1978). This Court is charged with liberally construing a pleading filed by a pro se litigant to allow for the ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.